ATTENTION SERVERS - DOUBLE OGRO FIX |
by eihrul
on 01/12/2004 05:48, 35 messages, last message: 04/14/2004 13:44, 10826 views, last view: 09/29/2024 02:20 |
|
I have made up some experimental servers that I *THINK* will fix the double ogro problem. These are protocol compatible with the current release.
I urge all current servers that are experiencing ogro duplication problems to try the following binaries out (for freebsd or linux):
http://tunes.org/~eihrul/freebsd_server
http://tunes.org/~eihrul/linux_server
Anybody running these experimental servers, please announce you are doing so and what IP/name you are, as I would also like players to ascertain whether they subsequently experience double ogro problems on said servers, and post results here!
|
|
Board Index
|
|
#17: Re: Update |
by kurtis84
on 02/01/2004 17:31, refers to #16
|
|
How about someone apply these changes to the win32 executable?
please
reply to this message
|
|
#18: Re: Update |
by Aardappel
on 02/01/2004 21:32, refers to #17
|
|
do any of the permanent servers on the net run on win32?
reply to this message
|
|
#19: Re: Update |
by kurtis84
on 02/01/2004 23:57, refers to #18
|
|
If by permanent you mean someone like me that leaves one running 24/7 aside from rare reboots...then yes. And it would be nice to not worry about it when browsing the server list for a game.
I've taken mine down for the time being...as this bug shows up way too much.
reply to this message
|
|
#20: Re: Update |
by spentron-postcrash2
on 02/02/2004 05:59, refers to #19
|
|
>I've taken mine down for the time being
I wish more would do this if they're not going to fix it. MOST of the ones appearing in the browser are bad, I even see people playing and get on and can't play. Possibly aggravated by modem.
Bad servers I've found so far (partial names):
tiggerswelt.net
supports.game-monster.de
ny-dunkirk...adelphia.net
cindy.coldmoon (ping champ)
dak0r.de
66.214.199.???
Different cube protocol:
flits.rug.nl
scott.blazing.de
reply to this message
|
|
#21: Re: Update |
by Aardappel
on 02/02/2004 23:00, refers to #20
|
|
if someone can take it upon themselves to try and reach these people that would be grand :)
reply to this message
|
|
#22: Re: mmm |
by hungerburg
on 02/05/2004 02:57, refers to #11
|
|
its a pity, but some asking around and digging the info-zip and power-archiver sites did not result in finding any windows apps, that support setting unix permissions in zip archives. also remembrance of the horror that hit me then starts to slowly fade.
reply to this message
|
|
#23: Re: mmm |
by Aardappel
on 02/07/2004 00:03, refers to #22
|
|
that's inconvenient. If me or eihrul thinks of it next release, I will send him the whole archive which he can then repackage.
reply to this message
|
|
#24: Ports? |
by Comander
on 02/07/2004 08:34
|
|
can who version more able pots make?
Multi ports like hlds..
reply to this message
|
|
#25: .. |
by pushplay
on 02/23/2004 00:01
|
|
bump
reply to this message
|
|
#26: .. |
by pushplay
on 02/23/2004 00:02
|
|
whoops, I have to bump this again
reply to this message
|
|
#27: This needs a |
by D.plomat
on 03/04/2004 14:26
|
|
bump
reply to this message
|
|
#28: .. |
by staffy02
on 03/09/2004 10:27
|
|
what does bump do?
reply to this message
|
|
#29: .. |
by para
on 03/10/2004 02:14
|
|
bump...
'cmon admins. get you server fix before i'm seeing double ALL the time :)
reply to this message
|
|
#30: Amen. |
by Pxtl
on 03/10/2004 02:58
|
|
The more annoying feature is that afflicted servers are stuck in "coop edit" mode and show too many players in the server browser. Very annoying when hunting for a game.
reply to this message
|
|
#31: .. |
by para
on 03/10/2004 23:14
|
|
funny thing is, i got on an internet server with the double ergo problem while my coworker, on the same office LAN, got on the same server and had no problem.
reply to this message
|
|
#32: another bump |
by makkE
on 03/18/2004 16:43
|
|
plz ppl try and contact the admins, I have done it for some... lanparty-nrw.de now worx again :)
others donĀ“t reply :(
reply to this message
|
|
#33: Re: another bump |
by Aardappel
on 03/18/2004 20:33, refers to #32
|
|
thanks for trying :)
I think the only way to get the admin's attention may be another release, and we will do one anyway since there is some great new content coming up..
I am going to be swamped up until the end of this month (GDC and all), but after that I want to make a push for releasing a new version.
reply to this message
|
|
#34: Re: A bump does... |
by D.plomat
on 03/26/2004 15:59, refers to #28
|
|
this ;)
(making the thread go to the top of the list, and avoid it leave out into the 'Archive' threads)
reply to this message
|
|
#35: .. |
by makkE
on 04/14/2004 13:44
|
|
bump, though the new release is in sight :)
reply to this message
|
|
|
Board Index
|
|