General Thread

by Aardappel on 01/05/2002 01:55, 15527 messages, last message: 03/01/2024 13:02, 12556453 views, last view: 11/06/2024 10:20

for questions, announcements etc.

   Board Index   

#11896: Re: Wings?

by c0rdawg on 03/27/2009 14:33, refers to #11895

The wings do not allow him to fly, it's just to show that he has quad damage...

reply to this message

#11897: Re: Wings?

by tentus_ on 03/27/2009 17:44, refers to #11896

Man, a flying mod would be pretty sweet... I think the sauer engine would lend itself to that very well, being based on 6-sided geometry.

reply to this message

#11898: ..

by Midnight Walker on 03/27/2009 20:15

Ah. Quad damage makes sense. So the next time I see a pig with wings, it would make sense to get out of the way, rather than pausing for a photo-op?

reply to this message

#11899: ..

by Julius on 03/28/2009 01:02

btw, huge improvement on the weapons department in the newest svn.
Just the anims are a bit slow (muzzleflash ist shown too long for example).

reply to this message

#11900: ..

by Fischkopf on 03/28/2009 11:58

what sauerbraten still needs are some good professional voices.

reply to this message

#11901: ..

by Fischkopf on 03/28/2009 23:54

Can you make ragdolls movable, when they are already dead?

reply to this message

#11902: Camera movement

by maximusw00t on 03/30/2009 21:09

One thing i have always wanted to know is if there is anyway to move where the 3rd person camera is placed, i know there is a way in blood frontier. but i love sauer so much more. so i wanted to move th camera to a over the shoulder look like in gears of war or mass effect.

so if there is a way please report back if not then tell me anyways x.x

---MaXiMuS

reply to this message

#11903: slomo death

by maximusw00t on 03/30/2009 21:14

just an idea i had a while back but decided it would be very cool because of the dying animation, but now that there is ragdolls this could be either annoying or cool.

what would you think

reply to this message

#11904: Re: Camera movement

by SheeEttin on 03/30/2009 21:47, refers to #11902

Yes. Mod the source.

reply to this message

#11905: Re: Camera movement

by maximusw00t on 03/30/2009 23:16, refers to #11904

not quite what i ment, ok here is the simple version. any way without having to redownload a copy of it if i screw up, or backing up

reply to this message

#11906: Re: Camera movement

by SheeEttin on 03/30/2009 23:16, refers to #11905

No.

reply to this message

#11907: Re: Camera movement

by maximusw00t on 03/30/2009 23:35, refers to #11906

your no help at all,meh i always thought sauer was full of nice people.

anyways if anyone could tell me what to do in the source that would be a help.

reply to this message

#11908: Re: ..

by Gambit on 03/31/2009 00:27, refers to #11869

With kernel 2.6.29 released last week , I though I'd like to share an update to my intel graphics on linux experience:

Good news: Either mesa-7.4 or xserver-1.6 fixed the see-through-walls (because I ran sauer before upgrading the kernel). In conjunction with kernel 2.6.29 and KMS, 3D/video playback/OpenGL is much better in general.

Disappointing (but not bad) news: Sauerbraten's FPS didn't have a significant boost, but I think there was one (a few fps higher). On map mach2, I can range from 30 fps max inside to 12 fps outside with "medium" graphics 1024x768 resolution. Didn't do a thorough test before kernel 2.6.29 though, just based on feeling.

So I think sauerbraten has improved with these new intel technologies, even if it is very slight. At least I can play again :D

reply to this message

#11909: Re: Camera movement

by Hapexamendios on 03/31/2009 00:34, refers to #11907

uh..He was nice enough to respond to your question and helpful enough to point you in the right direction.

You have to mod the source yourself to get the functionality you require. When you've finished, feel free to upload your work to Quadropolis for others to review and perhaps improve on.

reply to this message

#11910: Re: Camera movement

by maximusw00t on 03/31/2009 00:58, refers to #11909

yes i know all this, i am familier with quad even tho i cant upload my maps for crap. well this was usless.

reply to this message

#11911: Re: Camera movement

by a~baby~rabbit on 03/31/2009 01:16, refers to #11910

You said that blood frontier has the camera functionality you need - so there is the possibility of moding sauer with the relevant code from it. In which case asking the blood frontier developers might be a good way forward.

Of course this is non-trivial if you're unfamiliar with the code...

reply to this message

#11912: Re: Camera movement

by a~baby~rabbit on 03/31/2009 01:42, refers to #11911

-yawn-

src/engine/rendergl.cpp::recomputecamera()

Look for the line that says, "camera1->move = -1;"
add a new line under it, "camera1->strafe = -1;". Basically it's saying how the camera is to be moved from the player position.

reply to this message

#11913: Re: Camera movement

by Quin on 03/31/2009 02:18, refers to #11912

Can't do this because it changes the crosshair's location in 3D space, the stuff in BF has kludges to reorient the camera/worldpos.

reply to this message

#11914: Re: Camera movement

by maximusw00t on 03/31/2009 02:34, refers to #11913

well quin if you could help me in any way that would be so awsome...if not its ok.

reply to this message

#11915: Re: Camera movement

by Quin on 03/31/2009 07:16, refers to #11914

It's a major modification that actually breaks the network protocol to do correctly. It's not something that can be done (well) without getting the devs themselves to do it. There is some minor interest in it, but don't really expect it any time soon (or at all). These are First Person Shooters, as a result Third Person is not really very well supported or recommended (even in Blood Frontier, Third Person is not so crash hot).

To be perfectly honest, nobody is gonna write code for you. Your best place to start is probably http://www.gamedev.net/

reply to this message

   Board Index