The next update |
by legodt
on 05/06/2011 01:24, 333 messages, last message: 10/18/2012 04:52, 145267 views, last view: 12/09/2021 06:26 |
 |
|
What are the sort of things that the playerbase can expect from the next Sauerbraten update? Gamemodes, user interfaces, or graphical updates?
|
 |
|

Board Index

|
 |
#296: Depth of field |
|
by Speculant
on 07/04/2012 07:38
|
 |
|
The only thing I would really like to see added is depth of field, other than that the game is perfect!
reply to this message
|
 |
#297: Re: Depth of field |
|
by Q009
on 07/04/2012 11:41, refers to #296
|
 |
|
I'd rather want fully dynamic lighting with HDR rendering and shit.
Oh wait...
reply to this message
|
 |
#298: Re: Depth of field |
|
by suicizer01
on 07/04/2012 19:18, refers to #296
|
 |
|
... What do you mean?
reply to this message
|
 |
#299: Re: Depth of field |
|
by Q009
on 07/04/2012 19:25, refers to #298
|
 |
|
Depth of field
reply to this message
|
 |
#300: Re: Depth of field |
|
by Speculant
on 07/04/2012 20:03, refers to #298
|
 |
|
Where things far away are "out of focus". Most people would probably leave it off for high speed multiplayer (as depth of field reduces accuracy), but I think it would be a nice option to have.
reply to this message
|
 |
#301: .. |
|
by tempest
on 07/04/2012 21:12
|
 |
|
It's quite overhyped and very difficult to get right (i.e. noticeable, but not annoying). I doubt it'd be worth it.
reply to this message
|
 |
#302: Re: .. |
|
by ultrasemen
on 07/05/2012 06:26, refers to #301
|
 |
|
DoF - advanced sonyblur for their interactive movies.
HDR (not this technology itself, but how gamedesigners usually see it) - sonyoverexposure for their interactive movies.
So, it will be necessary only if you're porting Sauer to PS3.
reply to this message
|
 |
#303: Re: .. |
|
by Q009
on 07/05/2012 14:20, refers to #302
|
 |
|
You can see HDR working in Tesseract
reply to this message
|
 |
#304: Re: .. |
|
by eihrul
on 07/05/2012 18:40, refers to #303
|
 |
|
It's HDR, but not the 1337er sonyoverexposure tech. :(
reply to this message
|
 |
#305: Re: Depth of field |
|
by suicizer01
on 07/05/2012 20:11, refers to #300
|
 |
|
... you mean field of view. There's no such thing as depth of field.
reply to this message
|
 |
#306: Re: Depth of field |
|
by Q009
on 07/05/2012 20:24, refers to #305
|
 |
|
Wow. Just wow. Seriously?
No, there IS such a thing as Depth of Field.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Depth_of_field
Get your facts straight :P
reply to this message
|
 |
#307: Re: Depth of field |
|
by suicizer01
on 07/05/2012 20:37, refers to #306
|
 |
|
Then inform some more straight next time =P.
reply to this message
|
 |
#308: Re: Depth of field |
|
by Q009
on 07/05/2012 21:22, refers to #307
|
 |
|
no u
reply to this message
|
 |
#309: Re: Depth of field |
|
by suicizer01
on 07/05/2012 23:17, refers to #308
|
 |
|
I've discussed this with someone else already. Look at the context of what Specularis actually written. Both subjects would practically fit into it.
reply to this message
|
 |
#310: Re: Depth of field |
|
by Zamwa
on 07/06/2012 01:45, refers to #308
|
 |
|
You sound so irate about it! We all make mistakes lol!
Tomayto, tomahto!
reply to this message
|
 |
#311: Re: Depth of field |
|
by Q009
on 07/06/2012 13:08, refers to #310
|
 |
|
NO U
AAAARGGHHHHHHHHHH
reply to this message
|
 |
#312: Re: Depth of field |
|
by suicizer01
on 07/06/2012 16:10, refers to #311
|
 |
|
Yea I know I've farted my brains out off my ass this time =P.
reply to this message
|
 |
#313: .. |
|
by Papriko
on 07/26/2012 16:12
|
 |
|
Dumb to ask, but for when is it now announced? I believe to remember something like \"this year. unclear when exactly, but this year\" while someone else told \"still a bit less than a year left\". Now I am unsure.
reply to this message
|
 |
#314: Re: .. |
|
by eihrul
on 07/26/2012 19:09, refers to #313
|
 |
|
Some time this year.
reply to this message
|
 |
#315: .. |
|
by Papriko
on 07/26/2012 21:52
|
 |
|
Alright, thank you very much.
reply to this message
|
 |
 |
|

Board Index

|
 |